Skip to the main content
{}

Website redesign

Redesigning your website starts by deciding what should stay.

A slow, dated or confusing site does not automatically need rebuilding. Codegenie reviews the content, technology and enquiry journey before defining the smallest worthwhile improvement.

Keep, improve or replace?

Illustrative decision scenario, not a client case: an existing service website has useful text and project images, but mobile navigation and the enquiry route are unclear. We assess what each part needs; these are possible choices, not measured results.

Keep useful parts

The domain, recognisable service pages, current project images and working features can remain. First check ownership and whether the content and technology still fit the current business.

Explore the website approach

Improve specific bottlenecks

Clearer service descriptions, readable mobile templates, repaired links or an easier contact step can form a focused engagement. The affected pages and checks are identified in advance.

Explore maintenance and small changes

Replace when necessary

If the technical foundation cannot responsibly be continued, we scope its replacement. Useful content, existing URLs and necessary features are included in the migration plan. First send the URL, the bottleneck and what must remain; a detailed investigation needs its own agreement.

Discuss your existing website

What the work includes

01

Too few relevant enquiries

Check whether the offer, audience, evidence and contact step are clear. Better content or a shorter form can be more useful than a complete redesign.

02

Difficult mobile use

Review navigation, readability, images and contact options on small screens. A focused template improvement can retain existing content.

03

Outdated or difficult technology

Investigate what can safely remain. A new technical foundation is proposed only when focused improvement is not sufficient.

04

Migration without avoidable loss

Inventory existing pages, relevant searches and enquiry flows. Changed URLs need relevant destinations; forms and measurement need checking again.

A review with a practical outcome

Understand what can remain, the main bottlenecks and the next suitable step. A detailed technical investigation gets its own scope; initial contact is not a complete free audit.

  • 01Retain useful content, domains, strong URLs and working features.
  • 02Improve the pages and steps that block visitors or administrators.
  • 03Rebuild only the parts that cannot responsibly be retained.

Approach

From brief to delivery

Scope and responsibilities are clarified first. We then build and verify the solution in controlled steps.

  1. Review

    Assess the current site, audience and enquiry journey.

  2. Decide

    Scope what stays, improves or is replaced.

  3. Implement

    Build the changed pages and features with appropriate regression checks.

  4. Move

    Verify redirects, forms and agreed measurements after publication.

Frequently asked questions

Can a redesign damage my Google rankings?

Yes, for example when relevant pages disappear or redirect to unsuitable destinations. An inventory and migration plan reduce avoidable risk, but cannot guarantee rankings.

Will I receive a before-and-after report?

Agree the checks and reporting in the scope. Speed or conversion improvements are reported only when a consistent measurement method supports a valid comparison.

What should I send?

Your current URL, main problem and what you want to retain. System or analytics access is requested only when needed for an agreed investigation.

Is a free automatic website scan available here?

No. The former website-scan links lead to this website renewal service. This page does not run an automatic scan. Send your website and the issue for an initial discussion; a detailed investigation first needs an agreed scope.

Targeted improvement or a full redesign?

Send your current website and main problem. Explain which content and functionality must remain.